By Victoria Stanton. Published on February 5, 2013
Figuring out Erica Rand, the scholar
When I set out to talk to Erica Rand about her new book, Red Nails, Black Skates, I knew that other interviews and reviews focused on the book’s thematic contents — figure skating and Rand’s own experiences as an adult skater immersed in the sport she’d tried out as a child.
But I was more interested in the scholar than the skates.
Red Nails, Black Skates (Duke University Press, 2012) is something of a crash course in Rand’s area of cultural criticism, specifically the overt and insidious ways that gender and sexuality, as well as race and class, shape all of our identities and experiences.
That begs the question — in my case a series of questions — about the intertwined personal, scholarly and pedagogical commitments that influence cultural critics like Rand, the college’s Whitehouse Professor of Art and Visual Culture and of Women and Gender Studies.
In other words, how does she approach writing and teaching about something as both amorphous and intimate as culture?
“We participate in culture,” says Rand. “I want to show how we are participating in culture by modeling a critic who also looks critically at her own investments and the things she studies.”
Asked about her intended audience, Rand replies, “I envisioned the book being for a wide range of people. First of all, I have to admit I really wanted skaters to read it. I’m always interested in having my writing be accessible within and outside academics.
“Although I wanted to say hard and complicated things, I wanted to say it in an accessible way,” she says.
One such strategy was to divide the book into a series of short essays, allowing readers to encounter the ideas at their own pace.
Whether writing about a cultural phenomenon or teaching one of her courses here at Bates, Rand encourages her audience to recognize how they, too, perform and respond to gender.
In her course Women, Gender, Visual Culture, which she is teaching this semester, Rand asks her students to “understand that it is not as if some people over there have a gender story. Everyone has a gender story.”
That said, she’s not interested in “busting open all kinds of gender notions and throwing them all out.”
She explains that some people find pleasure in traditional expressions of femininity, herself included, and masculinity. What’s important, however, is that those expressions not be the result of restrictive stereotypes.
That self-awareness permeates Rand’s writing. For her, it says something about what she calls “the politics of academic work and the politics of criticism.”
As a scholar, Rand recognizes that she participates in the cultural phenomena she studies and is not shy about putting her personal perspectives front and center.
“People all have a personal stake in what they are studying and working on. They may tell you about it or they may not tell you about it. But I don’t believe, not only with popular culture but in any critical or academic endeavor, that there is a critic at some elevated level looking down.”
Leave a ReplyThis is a forum for sharing your thoughts about the preceding post with the public. If you have a question for the author, please email the Bates Communications Office at email@example.com.
News & Updates
Bates Communications Office
141-145 Nichols St.
Lewiston, Maine 04240
Phone: 1-207-786-6330 firstname.lastname@example.org