Stephen Engel, Chair

Stephen M. Engel



Associate Professor

Pettengill Hall, Room 178

Gender and Sexuality Studies

Wesleyan University (B.A., 1998); New York University (M.A., 2001); Yale University (Ph.D., 2009)

Curriculum Vitae

I am Associate Professor and Chair of Politics at Bates College and an Affiliated Scholar of the American Bar Foundation in Chicago (  My research and teaching focus on American political development, constitutional law, and social movements, particularly LGBTQ socio-political and legal mobilization.

I have authored three books. My first, The Unfinished Revolution: Social Movement Theory and the Gay and Lesbian Movement (Cambridge University Press 2001), evaluates how the distinct political institutional environments of the US and the UK affected the development, strategies, and goals of the LGBTQ rights movements in each country. My second, book, American Politicians Confront the Courts: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power (Cambridge University Press 2011), is a cross-institutional analysis that examines how changing understandings over time of loyal opposition has influenced elected branch relations with the federal judiciary. My most recent book, Fragmented Citizens: The Changing Landscape of Gay and Lesbian Lives (NYU Press 2016), utilizes concepts in the field of American Political Development, particularly the notion of a fragmented polity and the partiality of political change, to evaluate how and why inequalities for gay and lesbian citizens persist in the United States even as formal rules mandating equal treatment are put into effect.

I have recently completed a fourth volume, which I co-edited with Stephen Skowronek (Yale University) and Bruce Ackerman (Yale Law School). The Progressives’ Century: Political Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Making of the American State brings together over twenty political scientists, historians, legal academics, and economists to evaluate a century’s worth of progressive legal, political, and constitutional reform and to consider the resilience or exhaustion and to propose alternative formulations that might advance the cause of democratic renewal.

My latest project examines the concept of dignity in both the US and comparative constitutional context. I am interested in how dignity has been used in legal argumentation, especially in the context of LGBT rights litigation, and what the limits of that concept might be. The first paper in this project is a collaboration with Timothy Lyle, assistant professor of English at Iona College. Our forthcoming article in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, “Fucking with Dignity: Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and how the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking,” utilizes a queer theoretical lens to examine whether and how the bathhouse closures during the early years of the AIDS crisis in New York City and San Francisco constituted a dignity-taking. It then considers the limits of the dignity-restoration that is proceeding through Supreme Court rulings including Lawrence v. TexasUnited States v. Windsor, and Obergefell v. Hodges. Another working paper in this project explores the conservative jurisprudential implications of “dignity,” and offers a developmental explanation of why same-sex marriage rulings may be more secure – from a conservative jurisprudential perspective – than rights related to abortion access and race equality.

The common aims of my research are to gauge how institutional and ideational environments motivate, constrain, or otherwise affect political behavior and to explain changes over time in legal and political outcomes.  To accomplish this, my work utilizes a variety of qualitative and historical methods and engages scholarship from multiple disciplines including political science, history, law, and sociology.

My research has been supported by grants from and fellowships with

  • Bates College Faculty Development Fund
  • National Science Foundation
  • American Bar Foundation
  • Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund of the Yale Law School
  • Institute for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University
  • Yale University Center for the Study of American Politics
  • Yale University Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies


Fragmented Citizens: The Changing Landscape of Gay and Lesbian Lives. New York: NYU Press. 2016.


“Engel addresses the meaning of citizenship for gays and lesbians living in the modern political era. Engel notes that this period has been marked by landmark victories for gay and lesbian activists, in both state legislatures and the courts. Why then do political inequalities persist in an environment marked by such high profile legal victories? Notably, Engel’s framework of choice is that most closely associated with those who study American political development; those political scientists seek to ‘explain changes over long swaths of time’ by looking at multiple orders of authority within the state: laws and policies, norms, discourses, familial relations, and even employee-employer dynamics, among others. After an exhaustive look at aspects of ‘variable recognition’ in the formal recognition of same-sex intimacy, the author concludes that despite these important legal victories, gay and lesbian citizenship remains unstable and fragmented insofar as there is an ‘incomplete recognition of citizenship status across space, time and issue.’ Recommended primarily for serious researchers, including faculty and graduate students.” Choice

“[Engel] supports his thesis well with detailed and thoughtful analyses of key legal cases and decisions over the last 50 years, keeping tightly to his conceptual framework and offering a solid structure for understanding the chaotic development of rights of sexual minorities in the United States.” Publishers Weekly

The Progressives’ Century: Political Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Modern American State. S. Skowronek, S. Engel, and B. Ackerman, eds. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2016.


“[An] excellent series of essays on the legacy of the Progressives and the history of the Progressive Era . . . An extremely timely book that will appeal to a broad range of readers and interests.” Choice

American Politicians Confront the Court: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power.  New York: Cambridge University Press. 2011.


“Engel contributes a new, significant piece to the historical understanding of the way that elected officials regard and interact with the US judiciary. By Engel’s analysis, conflicts between the elected branches and the courts have been dramatically reshaped, now taking the form of “measures that harness judicial power for political ends” rather than actions that more directly undermine judicial legitimacy. Engel identifies this trend on the strength of his own exhaustive and painstaking historical work, starting with the early republic and extending all the way through the George W. Bush administration. In the process, he helps readers newly appreciate how originalism, signing statements, filibusters, and other tools of political power really work. Though the title suggests the possibility of a slightly broader scope (Engel’s analysis of the conflict is primarily limited to partisan debates and disagreements), his study is still groundbreaking by any definition. Summing Up: Highly recommended.” Choice

The Unfinished Revolution: Social Movement Theory and the Gay and Lesbian Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2001.


The Unfinished Revolution is remarkable for the elegance of its intellectual architecture.” The Gay & Lesbian Review

Peer-Reviewed Articles and Books Chapters

“Developmental Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Politics: Fragmented Citizenship in a Fragmented State,” Perspectives on Politics 13 (June 2015)

“Seeing Sexuality: State Development and the Fragmented Status of LGBTQ Citizenship.” Oxford Handbook on American Political Development, Vallely, Lieberman, and Mettler, eds. (online 2014). (print 2016)

“Frame Spillover: Media Framing and Public Opinion of a Multifaceted Rights Agenda,” Law and Social Inquiry 38 (Spring 2013)

“Assessing Presidential Manipulations of Federal Judicial Power” in The Politics of Judicial Independence, Bruce Peabody, ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010)

“Before the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Regime Unity, Loyal Opposition, and Hostilities toward Judicial Authority in Early America,” Studies in American Political Development 23 (Fall 2009)

“Political Education in/as the Practice of Freedom: A Paradoxical Defense from the Perspective of Michael Oakeshott.”  Journal of the Philosophy of Education 41 (September 2007)

“Organizational Identity as a Constraint on Strategic Action: A Comparative Study of Gay and Lesbian Interest Groups.”  Studies in American Political Development 21 (Spring 2007)

“History of Racial Politics in the US” in Racism, Xenophobia, and Distribution: A Study of Multi-Issue Politics in Advanced Democracies. John Roemer et. al. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage, 2006)

“Marketing Everyday Life:  The Postmodern Commodity Aesthetic of Abercrombie & Fitch.”Advertising & Society Review 5 (October 2004)

“Making a Minority: Understanding the Formation of the Gay and Lesbian Movement in the US.”Handbook of Gay and Lesbian Studies. Diane Richardson and Steven Seidman, eds. (London: Sage, 2002)

Courses Taught 2017-18

  • Constitutional Law I: Separation of Powers (PLTC 216) – Fall 2017 (2 sections)
  • Politics of Judicial Power (PLTC 351) – Fall 2017
  • Constitutional Law II: Rights and Identities (PTWS 282) – Winter 2018
  • Political Inquiry (PLTC s49) – Short Term 2018

Other Courses Taught

  • American Political Institutions and Processes (PLTC 115)
  • Queer Power: Political Sociology of U.S. Sexuality Movements (INDS 238) (crosslisted WGS and sociology)
  • Constitutional Law III: Voice and Liberty (PLTC 214)
  • American Political Development (PLTC 329)
  • The U.S. Presidency: Development and Problems (PLTC 329)