CMS150 - Winter 2001

Trials of Conscience: Litigation

and the Rhetoric of Identity

 Finals Study Guide



Terms, people and events you will be asked to identify
 
Adriano Sofri Annales school positivism imaginary biography social drama
root metaphor The House of Valois Salic law Great Schism Nullification Trial
Treaty of Troyes Robert de Baudricourt Pierre Cauchon Fairy Tree Joan of Arc's voices
The Angel's Crown metaphor allegory microhistory diachronic account
synchronic account Occitania Catharism parfaits consolamentum
Bishop Fournier Bernard Clergue tithe transhumance domus
pardon tale

 
 

According to Ginzburg, what are the similarities and differences between the intellectual methods of historians and judges?

Why are Turner's anthropological models so attractive to historians?  Pick a trial we have studied in class and explain it in terms of Turner's theory of social drama and root metaphor.

Why did the inquisitors think Joan was a heretic?

How might Joan of Arc  be a symbol of the theoretical issues raised in the stuudy of historical trials, and of history in general.

Why have the questions of language and narrative posed such philosophical and methodological problems to historians.

For some historians, however, attending to the narrative structures of evidence from trials has proven quite productive. Discuss at least two of the scholars and two of the trials we have studied this semester.

The trials of Rabirius and the Cathars of Montaillou pose radically different analytical problems for historians.  Why?  How, methodologically, should a historian respond to these problems?
 
 

ps: lecture outlines for the second half of the semester are posted.



Trials Homepage Course Requirements Required Books Syllabus
Course Description Analysis Forms Web Resources
Lecture Outlines Discussion Questions About the Prof Imber's Homepage